Shipowners - Local Knowldge Global Support

< go back to Drug Abuse Index Page

Drug Abuse at Sea:

Methods of drug testing


The effectiveness of a drug screening and testing program depends entirely upon its deterrent value. In other words it depends on whether the crew members believe that drug users will be detected or whether they believe that the system can be beaten. For example if seafarers believe that once a ship has been tested they are safe for six months, its effectiveness is greatly diminished.

There are a number of different methods of drug and alcohol testing. These include:

Pre-employment
Routine medical
Reasonable cause
Post incident
Random

Each has advantages and disadvantages. We recommend that more than one method of testing is utilised and that every programme should, if possible, include random testing.

Type Advantages Disadvantages
Pre-
employment
Establishes company's attitude to drugs and alchohol
Deters drug users joining company
Does not require changes to terms and conditions of employment
Helps to introduce concept of testing to other employees
Result is only valid for the day of the test
No deterrent factor for future use
May create blacklist of applicants in some sectorsNeeds record-keeping to avoid people re-applying for the same job
May be prohibited by local employment law
Routine Medicals Easy to administer Advance notice of dates means alchohol/illegal drug use can be adjusted to avoid detection
Post accident/post incident Indicates whether drugs or alchohol might have contributed to incident
Demonstrates that drugs/alchohol did not contribute to incident which brings PR benefits
If drugs/alchohol are found this may mean that other contributory factors are ignored
If drug or alchohol related this is identified after the event, i.e. too late
Reasonable cause, i.e. behavioural indicators May confirm suspicion of drug/alchohol consumption contributing to impairment and/or deteriorating work performance
If negative, may direct attention to some medical condition or other cause
Perception of victamisation.
Is not seen to apply equally to all crew, eg. who tests the Master?
If behaviour is drugs or alchohol related then problem use has already developed
Unannounced random selection Unpredictable
Constant possibility of selection means constant threat of detection
Impartial selection method can be inspected by crew representatives
Detterent effect encourages people to recognise problem use at an earlier stage
Nil or below average positive rate enhances company's image
Demonstrates company's pro-active approach to safety
Risk that administrative convenience can lead to bias in selection process
Need to closely define and monitor reasons for 'unavailibility' for test
Next Page