Shipowners - Local Knowldge Global Support
< go back to Stability Index Page

Stability:

Case Study 4

Vessel Type: Dry Cargo
Trading Area: Southeast Asia
Case No: 42200

Incident:
A Feeder Container Vessel had completed cargo operations at one berth and was in the process of shifting to a second berth. A harbour tug commenced pushing the vessel towards the berth when the member’s vessel began to heel over. When heeled over to approximately 10-15 degrees, containers began to fall off the vessel; the tug stopped pushing, and this action in conjunction with the loss of containers enabled the vessel to return to near upright.

Case 4 imageObservations:
The subsequent investigations showed that poor operational practices were allowed to take place onboard with very little regard to the safety of the vessel. The centre of gravity (KG) of the vessel was determined to be well above the maximum permitted and no account had been taken of the numerous free surfaces in the ballast tanks. To make matters worse, it was calculated that the vessel was in fact 400t over loaded, which resulted in her having a freeboard of approximately 30cms less than the minimum permitted. These factors combined to result in a drastic reduction of transverse stability which was insufficient to withstand the forces created by the pushing tug. Ironically, the top tiers of containers had not been secured but this allowed the containers to fall off and the vessel
returned to the upright. One of the contributing factors to the overloading was the under declaration of the container weights by the shipper. This case highlights the need to monitor the vessel’s condition at all times. By observing the drafts, the overloading would have been noted at an early stage and the vessel’s lack of adequate stability detected.

Financial Cost:
The total cost of this claim was in excess of US$660 000; a great deal of this was accounted for in recovering containers that sank in the approach channel to the berth.

Case 4 image

Top of Page